AARON HASS Ph.D.
HANDICAPPED PARKING HAS
OPENED UP A CAN OF WORMS. I REMEMBER when it was first implemented. I thought,
Great. It seemed an idea that sprang from our higher, altruistic self. Let
those who are hobbled cone first. It is easier for me to walk farther because I
am not burdened by any impediment. Handicapped parking was a fair idea. It was
an idea that lifted the impaired so that the playing field would become a level
one.
My admiration his given
way to anger. I am angry because a noble sentiment that reflects the best in us
is being abused. How many times have you and I see a perfectly healthy, able
individual emerge from his car parked in that space defined by blue?
But in the second case,
you hardly see it that way. Instead, you remind yourself of accumulate woes
that caused you to act as you did: I would have been more considerate if I
didn't have that flat tire on the way in, if I hadn't discovered this morning
that my accountant's bad advice cost me thousands of dollars, if I hadn't been
informed an hour ago that my grant application that consumed so much of my
efforts last year was rejected. No, you don't see yourself as a
some-of-a-bitch. Rather, you see yourself as a basically good person who is
having a very bad day.
Why am I so bother? Why
can't I just shrug it is a hurt, frightened, and disappointed plea: Why do you
have to remind me of the selfishness that lurks within? Why do you nourish my
cynicism?
A high production of
defendents in small claims proceedings never pay the judgments ruled against
them. However, in a study published in 1984, Craig Mc Ewen and Richard Maiman
noted the exceptions. Examining the records of six small claims courts in
Maine, the two investigators found that the chances of a defendant paying what
the court said he owed were significantly influenced by whether or not he
thought he had a fair hearing. This compliance pattern occurred no matter how
much the individual was required to pay. People responded to fairness with
integrity.